The Instigator
Con (against)
6 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Is Battlefield more innovative than Call of Duty?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/8/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 549 times Debate No: 45420
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




CoD 10 GHOSTS came out in November. I have been purchasing CoD since CoD: 4. Between Spec. ops, Zombies, and now Extinction, Call of Duty is now leading the field in the advancement of new game play modes. Moreover, Call of Duty has shown numerous advancements in mechanics over Battlefield. CoD not only added advanced mantling, but also implemented contextual lean for use in-game. Battlefield 4 hasn't changed anything but the maps, guns, and graphics engine. CoD has redesigned the whole multiplayer around with Blitz, Cranked, and Hunted, not to mention Extinction. Battlefield hasn't come close to this. BF4 is merely a reskined BF3. Battlefield 4 lacks any real advancement in game play, mechanics, or game modes. Battlefield hasn't changed at all.


Saying that Battlefield is a reskined,Battlefield 3,can be said for most modern day games. Call Of Duty Ghosts isn't all that different from past Call Of Duty's,which isn't anything that is bad,if a formula works for a company,why should they innovate,it's capitalism. Battlefield 4 and Call Of Duty Ghosts Instinctively,are two different games,with different Online modes,Battlefield 4 has large map's,Call Of Duty Ghosts has very small maps,when compared to the scope of Battlefield Maps,which isn't a bad thing,it's all personal preference,on what you personally like better. You pose an argument,saying that Battlefield 4 lacks any "Real" advancement in gameplay,mechanics or Game Modes,what exactly do you mean when you espouse that argument? Are you saying that Battlefield 4 offers no progression in gameplay,becuase last time i checked Battlefield 4 had a progression system,which is harder,and more complex than Ghosts. Ghosts is a much more casual form of shooter,compared to BF4.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TheTenthDoctor 2 years ago
Call of duty has even reused animations from past games the animations in cod ghosts are sloppy and look like a pathetic excuse for claymation. In battlefield they've made the advanced destruction engine the new levolutions all add to the games feel cod ghosts feels like something they made while they were drunk and bored.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by UltimateRussian 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: There were random capitals in pros arguments so he lost spelling and grammar. For best argument pro only attempted to counter cons argument but failed since con referred to earlier COD games giving more believability to con.