The Instigator
ReplenishTheInnocence
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
bahern
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

Is Being gay right?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
bahern
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/4/2016 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 396 times Debate No: 86042
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

ReplenishTheInnocence

Con

Is it ok? is it wrong?
bahern

Pro

Being homosexual is morally ok. I don't feel that love can be set to a specific gender. Its more based on personality.
Debate Round No. 1
ReplenishTheInnocence

Con

Is it physically ok? yes i know many hetero couples take part in unpure acts..such as oral and anal sex..but the thing with homosexuals is they have no option to have normal and pure sex so how can it be right? if it goes against the laws of science
bahern

Pro

Evolution has allowed many species to adapt for better survival. Part of the adaptions humans have formed is the ability to comprehend ideas in depth. If we can understand the concept of love without just basing it on physical attractions and/or the sexual organ of our partner then I feel we are allowed to express that adaption. I feel that oral and anal sex are in the same boat. If both consent then they should be allowed to explore the mind they were given.
Debate Round No. 2
ReplenishTheInnocence

Con

how could it be evolution to adapt to survive when all it brings is medical problems...there are two sexual organs and that is all they where used as the method of reproduction if we evolved to adapt why would we use parts that cannot reproduce children.....then we wouldnt be top of the food chain would we the most superior....survival of the fittest
bahern

Pro

First off I am not sure what you mean by medical problems. Secondly, there are plenty of straight people to support the group of homosexuals in society so reproduction should not be an issue. Even if all couples in the world were homosexual, you can still use stem cells to produce offspring. Like I said, our ability to study nature and alter it is an adaption that allows us to survive.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by JohnFx 1 year ago
JohnFx
Whenever I see someone throw out that "{insert thing} goes against the laws of science" they automatically lose. Unless they are talking about conservation of momentum or something.
Posted by Addy44 1 year ago
Addy44
Technically you should be asking if being gay is WRONG. No sexual orientation is necessarily RIGHT. Being gay is ok, being bisexual is ok, being heterosexual is ok" all sexual orientations are ok!
Posted by Linkstart 1 year ago
Linkstart
I do not understand why people hate it. Its not like homosexuals are breaking down there doors and making them have sex with the same gender.
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
Do you mean right like morally, or right like factually?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by HSamei1999 1 year ago
HSamei1999
ReplenishTheInnocencebahernTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: First off, 1 problem is that con is trying to say whether they are ok or not, while the topic of the debate is whether it is right. The consistent use of questions really makes it hard to understand Con's points clearly. Pro attempts to explain most of Con's objections and basically the two positions can be summed up making these two points: Pro: Express ourselves how we want with others consent if it involves them Con: Inability to participate in reproductive sex One thing I really hoped that Pro would bring up is that that is not the only reason to have sex. People have sex for pleasure and that is why anal, oral, and whatever other sex is done. Pro however did allude to how people do not always have sex for reproducing, but also to express themselves and that was an alternative to the case of reproducing set forth by Con, so I would have to say he wins since Con was trying to argue whether it is okay and had to points standing.