The Instigator
AKMan
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Al-Kitab
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Is Christianity a more reasonable, rational, and logical religion than Islam?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Al-Kitab
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/18/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 866 times Debate No: 49414
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (2)

 

AKMan

Pro

I believe that Christianity is a more logical religion than Islam. By this, I mean that it is the most believable and closest to the Truth. I belive it has less faults than Islam.

This will be the format of our argument. There are 5 rounds.
Round 1: Introduction & Main Claim
Round 2: First Sub-Claim.
Round 3: Second Sub-Claim. Counterclaim & Refutation.
Round 4: Third Sub-Claim. Counterclaim & Refutation.
Round 5: Summarize Your Argument. End Using A Persuasive & Convincing Statement.

ALWAYS REMEMBER: If you are using facts, evidence, or proof of any sorts, cite your sources!
You need to be credible, or nobody will believe you!
You DO NOT need a full length bibliography, just a web address (URL) or other short citation. Do not cite anything you cannot find online.
Al-Kitab

Con

I accept your challenge with peace.

There is no such thing as "a more logical religion" or "Closest to the truth".

1 + 1 = 2

It is the truth. Any other answer is illogical, irrational and unreasonable.

I know Islam is the truth without any faults.

My main claim will be Islam agrees to the universal laws of reason, ration and logic.

I will also show how christian ideology lacks basic knowledge and fails in its quest to guide.
Debate Round No. 1
AKMan

Pro

AKMan forfeited this round.
Al-Kitab

Con

lol I won the first round with 1+1=2
l'll wait for you to begin, might get another win without effort
Debate Round No. 2
AKMan

Pro

AKMan forfeited this round.
Al-Kitab

Con

He scores again lol
Lets try this one more time
Your turn
Debate Round No. 3
AKMan

Pro

AKMan forfeited this round.
Al-Kitab

Con

And he wins again.
final round....fight
Debate Round No. 4
AKMan

Pro

AKMan forfeited this round.
Al-Kitab

Con

flawless victory
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Finalfan 3 years ago
Finalfan
Both are two bowls of batcrap crazy to me... however Christianity has soooo many interpretations making it more versatile in the era in which we live! Islam is not much different than Christianity was about 100 years ago! Both archaic and barbaric.. Both extremely obsolete!
Posted by NiqashMotawadi3 3 years ago
NiqashMotawadi3
The debate is ridiculously partitioned. You can only address a particular subject once per round.
Posted by dmussi12 3 years ago
dmussi12
I don't have a problem with questioning beliefs, but it seems odd that he would be Islamic if he thinks that Christianity is more rational. I was wondering if he made a mistake on his profile, is considering conversion, or is playing devil's advocate for the purpose of spiritual development.
Posted by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
People can go against their religion. You got a problem with that?
Posted by dmussi12 3 years ago
dmussi12
Your profile says you are Islamic.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by NiqashMotawadi3 3 years ago
NiqashMotawadi3
AKManAl-KitabTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
Vote Placed by The_Scapegoat_bleats 3 years ago
The_Scapegoat_bleats
AKManAl-KitabTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was a disgrace to both parties. Pro forfeited, so conduct would usually be given to Con. But con was gloating over it with malicious glee, costing him conduct again. This is a tie, because nobody presented any arguments.