The Instigator
xqz
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Kove_Ducote
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Is Dumbledore better than Gandalf?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Kove_Ducote
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/6/2016 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 11 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 662 times Debate No: 95922
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (36)
Votes (2)

 

Kove_Ducote

Con

You say that Dumbledore is better than Gandalf, however, I will have to snipe your example of a "debate."

You have provided no argument as to why Dumbledore is "better than" Gandalf. This means that your ideas are baseless and are only flooding the DDO Debate List.

You have not clarified which category you think Dumbledore is "better" in. Judging by your diction, I shall presume that you are challenging the idea that Gandalf is stronger than Dumbledore. The notion that Dumbledore holds more power than Gandalf does is silly.

While it is inarguable that Dumbledore is a powerful wizard, controversially the most powerful wizard in the world of Harry Potter, he simply cannot hold a candle to Gandalf. Gandalf is the essence of power; he was an immortal spirit who took on the body of Gandalf the Gray and was even able to revive himself as Gandalf the White. He has power beyond mortals; Dumbledore simply cannot compete with his power.
Debate Round No. 1
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by FurryDragon 11 months ago
FurryDragon
xqzKove_DucoteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins, due to no evidence from pro side. Or arguments, for that matter.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 11 months ago
dsjpk5
xqzKove_DucoteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was the only one who made an argument, so arguments to Con by default.