The Instigator
jar2187
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
Goldmarker
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points

Is Equality Possible?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/26/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,975 times Debate No: 16720
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

jar2187

Con

I will be arguing that true equality amoung human beings is not possible.

I think that The Amazing Atheist makes my point clear when he states:

Thus, true equality is not possible amoung human beings. Thank you
Goldmarker

Pro

First off, i would like to thank you for making this argument

secondly

i would like the voters to know that the Con did not use his own thoughts in this debate
he took a youtube video and let that say his arguments

which is copywrite

i did not watch this video because it was not of the Con's work and did not give his own points

Now i will start my points.

DEFINE EQUALITY!!!

e·qual·i·ty  http://sp.dictionary.com...; type="application/x-shockwave-flash">http://sp.dictionary.com...; />[ih-kwol-i-tee] Show IPA


–noun, plural -ties.
1.
the state or quality of being equal; correspondence inquantity, degree, value, rank, or ability.

2.
uniform character, as of motion or surface.

3.
Mathematics . a statement that two quantities are equal;equation.


http://dictionary.reference.com...



Lets take note of #2

Uniform charater, as of motion or surface

now let me show you a picture

http://media.photobucket.com...

as shown in the picture
we have UNIFOMED CHARATERS as of surface

them being uniformed charaters fits the definition of Equality

so yes, equality is possable

VOTE PRO!!!!
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Goldmarker 6 years ago
Goldmarker
this is to kohai vote

he said
"Pro forgets the fact that the debate is caliming that equality among PEOPLE is impossible. His argument holds no water."

1st. the title of the debate is
"Is equality possible?"

2ed. my argument and example of uniformed characters is among human beings
Posted by Goldmarker 6 years ago
Goldmarker
i will accept this, but i must do some resurch first
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by DoctorDeku 4 years ago
DoctorDeku
jar2187GoldmarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: No warrant from the Con.
Vote Placed by medic0506 6 years ago
medic0506
jar2187GoldmarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's picture defeats his argument. The soldiers uniforms are the same colors, but as per definition 2 that he used, the soldiers are not equal in surface, as some are taller, some shorter.
Vote Placed by SkepticsAskHere 6 years ago
SkepticsAskHere
jar2187GoldmarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con just posted a youtube video instead of actually debating. Video was also crude
Vote Placed by kohai 6 years ago
kohai
jar2187GoldmarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forgets the fact that the debate is caliming that equality among PEOPLE is impossible. His argument holds no water.