First off, I would like to keep this as professional as possible. But Science has proved that Evolution is the more viable source. Take Noah's Ark for example, it said that a man gathered 7,000 species of animals, and then put them on a boat for survival, well take the Kangaroo for example, it is indigenous to Australia, and if Noah's Ark took place the Middle East, shouldn't there be fossils of kangaroos anywhere in that 6,000 mile span? But there isn't.
I just have one word. Pangea. That explains how they all got there. But Pangea was so long ago, you say. But what if science got the age of the Earth wrong? Everything we think happened, actually happened a lot quicker. And then, for some unfathomable reason, it began to slow down. The flooding of the Earth could have happened right when the continents began to break apart and rearrange. And just because we have models for how the tectonic plates shifted, doesn't mean it actually happened that way. The "middle-east" could have been just "the middle" at that point. And with God somehow contacting two of every animal on the planet (which we know happened, since no excess of any species showed up), he would have taken care of them on the journey there (what did he care about strange food popping up all over the place? He was about to drown everyone!)
Anyway, I'll hand that back to you, make of it what you will.