Is Free Limitless Energy a Good Thing?
Debate Rounds (3)
Round 1- Acceptance
Round 2- Arguments
Round 3- Conclusions
I believe limitless energy would be greatly appreciated world wide.
With the need of new industry for economic survival on all continents, limitless energy (LE) would be greatly welcomed.
Limitless energy could be used to in factories.This would save industries money which can be returned to their business in some fashion.
Countries that have no industrial background would benefit from this as well, because now they would have capabilities never before comprehensible.
Every person who spends money on fuel and electricity would save substantial amounts of income. This would boost economic growth in the areas in which those people lived.
Societies that never possessed the convenience of electricity or urban living would have a new found comfort of life that can deliver unlimited possibilities.
I'm not sure what else to write or how to conclude.
Any advice is appreciated.
A)- 3rd World "Urbanization"
While free clean energy could be good for less than developed countries, it would eventually cause an economic collapse, and be a while until they could properly utilize it. Majority of their economies are based around 1 thing: oil, and free energy would put them out of business. You would have to completely rebuild their economy from the ground up in countries like Dubai, where the only export is oil.
B)- People are ***holes
If the world had clean free energy, what is to stop people and governments from abusing it and doing terrible things with it? If we have unlimited energy in our cars, what is to stop governments around the world putting unlimited energy in their tanks, bombers, and other weapons of war? It would only allow war to be waged with fewer resources and for less money. And how would we know energy in third world countries is even being used to better their country? How would we know local warlords aren't just hoarding it and extorting people to further there goals. It has happened in Africa before, except instead of energy it was Unicef's food shipments in Somalia.
These are my key reasons why this would be a BAD idea.
I believe all economies would have a limited collapse and a huge industrial boom.
Even though other economies are based on oil, I believe it is fair to assume they only allow this because they have had no need to form a new income source to strengthen their economy.
I assume most cruel intentions are derivatives of greed. Greed should be almost non-existent if something more valuable than gold were freely accessible to anyone who wished to obtain it.
Energy is the only thing more valuable than gold.
If LE were available to all households in every society, the limitations of small business in these societies would endless.
When you combine the value of LE with human innovation and the human will to survive, our future would be unfathomably good for all societies.
Thanks for the introductory debate L_A_B, it was fun =)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Muted 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: The proposition being argued is really weird. It should have been "free limitless usable energy." Both arguments are not strong, but I think Con's was a little better
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.