Is God real
Debate Rounds (3)
I am earth, without earth for me to stand on I couldn't be here, so I am the earth beneath me, illuminati=light now, I am my eyes, my eyes are matter, so I am the light I see, I am...
natural cause=random(not intended)
randomness+logic=chaos(all natural change in eternity including evolution)
optional debate subject, just to expand a bit)
natural cause is random, not intended, intend is supernatural or mechanical
if you push me off a cliff I might die, cause=you pushed me, effect=I fall and die(logic), if we remove the cause and effect relation, you didn't push, and I didn't fall and die, this that logic disappears,
if you eat a poisonous mushroom, does it matter what you think is going to happen if the mushroom is poinsonous enough to make you really sick?
my old definition of logic was the implication of matter against matter, but emotion is caused by thought(mental emotion, not joy and pain), so logic is more then just that, so cause and effect is logic is true because what isn't logic, what isn't causal
matter can only transform, never be created or destroyed, make the matter that is an apple into nothing, I dare you, so matter has no begininnig and no end, witch rules out god, because anything that is created has a beginning, and matter is eternal
transformation is from something to something,
god can only come after nature, as super nature is in contrast with nature, and god is simply information, and the myth is false because he can not have created everything when he must come from nature, ye
the big bang theory is false, atleast the part about time having a beginning, matter is space, and space is time, and matter can never be created or destroyed
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: pro was fully refuted.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.