The Instigator
wildphysicist
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Luteraar
Con (against)
Winning
47 Points

Is God real?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
Luteraar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/4/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 418 times Debate No: 67809
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (10)

 

wildphysicist

Pro

God is real
Luteraar

Con

You are making the claim that god is real, therefor you need to provide proof for his existence.

As far as I know, there is no real evidence of his existence.
Debate Round No. 1
wildphysicist

Pro

wildphysicist forfeited this round.
Luteraar

Con

I stand by my previous argument, I will not reply anymore until you say something.
Debate Round No. 2
wildphysicist

Pro

God is real. We found some evidence like noah's ark. We found it.
Luteraar

Con

Luteraar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
wildphysicist

Pro

If God doesn't exist then who made the Bible.
Luteraar

Con

I am fairly certain you are not being serious. But what the hell, I'll keep going.

Can you provide proof that the ark was found?

The bible was written by a lot of different people a long time ago.
Debate Round No. 4
wildphysicist

Pro

So are you convince yet? Without God we wouldn't live or exist.
Luteraar

Con

I am fairly certain I have won this debate, since pro was just trolling.

Thanks for the free points.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Vajrasattva-LeRoy 1 year ago
Vajrasattva-LeRoy
Yes.
Yes I am real.
.................
Islam, by definition, means submission to the will of God.
There is no such religion as submission to the will of God,
Since people have been Refusing to submit all along,
Islam has to be FALSE.
@Con:
You're making the same mistake that Trolls, Demons, etc. ,
have made concerning other Debates.
Pro's premise "God Is real."
is just that.
He doesn't have to prove that God is real-
you have the BOP to show he's not.
Finding Noah's Ark wouldn't prove that God is real.
According to news reports, a Chinese-Kurdish Research team
announced back in 2010 that they'd found a large wooden structure on Mt. Ararat,
which some have claimed was, in fact, Noah's Ark.
Posted by Brasidas 1 year ago
Brasidas
I would have just gone along the line that many Muslims clearly do not view the book as perfect and complete. If you think a book is perfect and complete no other sources are required. If you need to follow claims to actions of Muhammad in hadiths and make them as if divinely inspired then you cease to make the Qur'an perfect and complete, as they should have been included in the Qur'an.
Those that follow such works thus make the Quran incomplete and far from perfect

Have nothing personal against Muslims, many are nice but to me this is a huge contradiction within their faith.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by YaHey 1 year ago
YaHey
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro awarded an innadaquate amount of time in each round for the debate to be properly debated, and failed to meet their own ridiculous expectations. Arguments: Pro made several wild and unsupported assertions while never meeting their burden of proof to show that God exists.
Vote Placed by chrisjachimiak 1 year ago
chrisjachimiak
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: One of the most terrible debate rounds that I have ever seen in my life. Wildphysicist, you had no sources to back up any of your arguments. Luteraar, you had no sources as well, and also had terrible points. Overall terrible debate.
Vote Placed by pcgross2000 1 year ago
pcgross2000
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: God is real
Vote Placed by Tweka 1 year ago
Tweka
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff and Pro did not meet his BoP
Vote Placed by Zarroette 1 year ago
Zarroette
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not meet his BoP, so Con wins arguments by default. Conduct is equal due to even round forfeits between the sides.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: pro trolled
Vote Placed by Lexus 1 year ago
Lexus
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: neither side really showed that god is real or isn't. CONduct to con because of ff
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Trolling by Pro. If you want to have a troll debate, you need to say so in the resolution, or first round.
Vote Placed by hayhen13 1 year ago
hayhen13
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Very stupid debate. Pro promised to provide proof, none was met. Just trolling.
Vote Placed by o0jeannie0o 1 year ago
o0jeannie0o
wildphysicistLuteraarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: pro was trolling, no real argument, bible is not a source, no period at beginning for grammar