First off I just want to address the fact that I am not trying to offend anybody with any of my arguments, I may use facts or personal opinion but this is strictly professional. The Call of Duty franchise spans further along the history of gaming, it was a breakthrough in the FPS community. The Halo franchise is a non-realistic, confusing, and all around frivolous game. Also I personally believe that realism is a big deal in video games, and Halo doesn't have that aspect for me. Call of Duty has based its games on events that have actually happened whereas the Halo has based its game purely on science FICTION or fantasy. Also in your previous argument all you stated was the customization process was more in depth than call of duty but in Black Ops III there is a lot of customization opportunities so that argument is null and void.
The Halo events may not be true but tell me.In multiplayer of COD can you ride vehicles?No, In Halo multiplayer you can ride worthogs,mongoose,bansheses,ghosts,eta. The splater kills some times provide funny moments.In call of duty you cant even get into the vehicle that are put into the map.
Although there are vehicles in the Halo games and not the CoD games, we can see from statistics that people generally play CoD more than Halo. An online study showed that over half of the FPS gaming community agrees that CoD is better than Halo. I urge voters to vote con simply because of my opponents lack of evidence and because he's showing extreme bias.