The Instigator
draxhunter
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
zkolodny
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points

Is Hilary Clinton a good leader?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
draxhunter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/24/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 522 times Debate No: 49835
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

draxhunter

Con

Hilary Clinton has managed to lie to the US and the world. She believes saving the environment rather than create jobs and freed the poor are important. She has lied to many times that's enough for a lying thief.
zkolodny

Pro

Since you gave me only 5 minutes for each debate round, I will not have time for sources. What is your proof that Hillary Clinton lied to America? What are your sources? And why can you not focus on the enviorment and create jobs at the same time?
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 2 years ago
donald.keller
draxhunterzkolodnyTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made a case, while Pro depended on the "Evidence of absence" fallacy rather than arguing his own.
Vote Placed by EndarkenedRationalist 2 years ago
EndarkenedRationalist
draxhunterzkolodnyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: These one round debates are always tougher to judge. I recommend having more rounds in the future. CON made some (unsubstantiated) arguments, which PRO pointed out. However, PRO did not raise any points of his own. CON made a few grammatical errors ("rather than create jobs and freed the poor"), so S&G go to PRO. Neither side used sources, though PRO explained why. Because PRO tried in that manner, I award PRO conduct as well. Next time, try longer debates! It's good to see some back-and-forth.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
Geogeer
draxhunterzkolodnyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Bizarre debate. Pro should have paid attention to the terms of the debate before accepting. Con was the only one of the two debaters to provide an argument. Points Con.