The Instigator
EcoFriendly
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TinyBudha
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Is Hydropower a reliable solution to growing energy demands?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TinyBudha
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/31/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 549 times Debate No: 78297
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (10)
Votes (2)

 

EcoFriendly

Con

*Reply in comments before acceptance.
*Fresh and or Salt water methods acceptable

New to this, lets see how it goes.

1st Round: Acceptance
2nd Round: Supporting arguments
3rd Round: Refuting arguments
4th Round: Concluding statements
TinyBudha

Pro

I accept, pro takes the burden of proof in this debate.
Debate Round No. 1
EcoFriendly

Con

Yes, speedy gonzales be patient.
TinyBudha

Pro

forfeit, burden of proof unfulfilled. Vote con.
Debate Round No. 2
EcoFriendly

Con

Alrighty then lol
TinyBudha

Pro

con accepts bop as instigator and fails to even try and meet. vote pro.
Debate Round No. 3
EcoFriendly

Con

*crickets* okay you won... don't take it to seriously haha
Debate Round No. 4
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
It doesn't matter. Con conceded the debate, so even if asking to vote for the other side is a forfeit, which it is not, Con technically forfeited first.
Posted by TinyBudha 2 years ago
TinyBudha
sht. VOTE PRO
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
Oops Pro. You said vote Con. You mean "vote Pro".
Posted by TinyBudha 2 years ago
TinyBudha
easy win
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
Pro wins by default. Con failed to post a supporting argument, and now he can only use rebuttals. And if Con has the BoP, he needs to make an argument. Pro only needs to negate the resolution.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
Nice supporting argument.
Posted by TinyBudha 2 years ago
TinyBudha
you gona argue?
Posted by TinyBudha 2 years ago
TinyBudha
you raised the acceptance standards so now it wont let me accept. Either lower them or edit the debate and assign me as the opponent at the top of the screen
Posted by EcoFriendly 2 years ago
EcoFriendly
Alright, I increased amount of characters and decreased time. However, Increasing the amount of characters may not help you. I wanted a low character count for argument quality purposes.
Posted by TinyBudha 2 years ago
TinyBudha
I would accept if you increased the character space and decreased the time limit to 2 days response time.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 2 years ago
Midnight1131
EcoFriendlyTinyBudhaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: As Con said, "okay you won." This is a concession, so arguments to Pro.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
EcoFriendlyTinyBudhaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded in round four.