The Instigator
Walrus101
Pro (for)
Winning
21 Points
The Contender
KingAwesome
Con (against)
Losing
20 Points

Is KingAwesome a D-Bag

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
Walrus101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/12/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,311 times Debate No: 32417
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (8)

 

Walrus101

Pro

Yes, of course he is.
KingAwesome

Con

First off, we need to define what is meant by "d-bag."

I'm guessing you're referring to a certain female hygeine product? But what exactly makes a person a "D-bag."

Please define behaviors associated with a person of this variety.
Debate Round No. 1
Walrus101

Pro

I think we both know what I am talking about. Your failure to care about anything but your rifle, terrible fashion, and bad hair sums up everything I am talking about. These are not insults, only observations. You have no counter argument here, KingAwesome.
KingAwesome

Con

What is meant by rifle? If you are using this word the way I think you are, then you are the true d-bag among us.

On the front of terrible fashion, I would like to address the fact that unlike my opponent, my closet contains more than just a variety of polos. I guess that fashion is really all opinion, but I think that everyone can agree that some variety is needed in everyone's wardrobe.

Now about the bad hair. My opponent is anything but an expert on hair, I don't believe that he even owns a brush. He wakes up every morning and walks out the door. I'm not going to say that his hair looks bad, but I will say that maybe he would be better off bald.

Again, these are just observations, not insults. Think you for the debate and good luck!
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Anon_Y_Mous 4 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
The debate was about you, therefor his 'insults' were valid arguments. You, however, began to 'insult' Walrus101, which was not the subject of the debate.
Posted by KingAwesome 4 years ago
KingAwesome
To everyone saying that Pro had better conduct: please explain what you mean. You say that I personally attacked my opponent in the last section. I was only responding to my opponent's statements. Look in his last section, where he talks about my "terrible fashion, and bad hair." I don't understand how what I said is personal and how this is not. Also my arguments were not to prove that I am less of a "d-bag" than Walrus, rather, they were to debunk Walrus's arguments about why I was. I can't think of how anyone is supposed to go through this debate with perfect conduct, the subject matter simply doesn't allow for it. Overall, this was a very entertaining debate to participate in, thank you Walrus.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Napoleon_Dynamite_915 4 years ago
Napoleon_Dynamite_915
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Walrus KingAwesome was insulting Walrus's way of life.
Vote Placed by Georgenewland 4 years ago
Georgenewland
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: To tie it up and leave it to someone else
Vote Placed by jordansshuler 4 years ago
jordansshuler
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: Voting Honestly. You both deserve a few points.
Vote Placed by Pennington 4 years ago
Pennington
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never defined what a 'D-Bag' is and therefore lost the argument because he never told us what too look for. Con lost conduct by the end because of his attacks. Con has the better source on himself and Pro never showed us anything otherwise. I even the S/G.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 4 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was winning to begin with, and he won in the end, too. Pro simply stated facts and arguments about why Con is a D-Bag. In response, Con began to personally attack Pro, which was not the point of the debate. The topic is 'King Awesome is a D-Bag', not 'King Awesome is a bigger D-Bag than Walrus101'. Pro wins grammer because in the last sentence, Con said 'Think you for the debate and good luck!'. Think, not thank. Pro also wins conduct because Con personally attacked Pro, which did nothing to support his point.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: I would vote con, but in the final round he broke into attacks unrelated to the issue in question.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Reinstating NP's vote because it's legit.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 4 years ago
MassiveDump
Walrus101KingAwesomeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter Napoleon Dynamite.