The Instigator
HeyBabe
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
SJM
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Is Michael Jackson Really Innocent?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
SJM
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/25/2016 Category: Music
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 464 times Debate No: 93093
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

HeyBabe

Pro

Everyone knows about what happened to Michael Jackson back in 1992. And again in 2003. And again in 2013. And again in 2016? As a Michael Jackson fan, I really wanted to believe he was innocent. And for a while, the evidence was really against him being guilty. That seems to be changing. What do you guys think? Is he really guilty? Should we even be bothering to get into this since he's dead? Should we just respect his memory? I want to know what you guys think.
SJM

Con

I accept. Just some observations.

The resolution is if someone is innocent.

Therefore the only thing that I need to prove is that Michael Jackson isn't innocent from something, it could be anything. Years aren't specific enough.
Debate Round No. 1
HeyBabe

Pro

HeyBabe forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
HeyBabe

Pro

HeyBabe forfeited this round.
SJM

Con

Forfeit. I claim victory.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by warren42 1 year ago
warren42
HeyBabeSJMTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
HeyBabeSJMTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff many times, so conduct to Con.
Vote Placed by David_Debates 1 year ago
David_Debates
HeyBabeSJMTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.