The Instigator
Jake99
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Theoretician101
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points

Is Naturalism logical?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Theoretician101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/16/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 350 times Debate No: 60559
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Jake99

Con

1.) Opening argument
2.) Rebuttals
3.) Further arguments
4.) Rebuttals
5.) closing statements

Naturalism in this argument is referring to the belief that nothing exists outside of nature.

Naturalism seems flawed to me because a naturalist has to go off the critical assumption that the universe continued as it did in the beginning of time. This is impossible to say because we do not know, because there is no way of telling. Also for everything in the world there has to be a creation or a compilation of already existing matter. You would have to say there is either no creation or that there was another universe before this one. The first conclusion leads a dead end, and the latter creates more and more questions.
Theoretician101

Pro

How about we make first round acceptance. This sequence is much better.
Debate Round No. 1
Jake99

Con

Jake99 forfeited this round.
Theoretician101

Pro

Theoretician101 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Jake99

Con

Jake99 forfeited this round.
Theoretician101

Pro

Theoretician101 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Jake99

Con

Jake99 forfeited this round.
Theoretician101

Pro

I am sorry dear opponet, I was very busy lately. How about we call this debate off.
Debate Round No. 4
Jake99

Con

Jake99 forfeited this round.
Theoretician101

Pro

Theoretician101 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
Jake99Theoretician101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff