Is Norway one of the most beutifull countries in Europe (it is a stupid argument)
Debate Rounds (3)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||2|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct throughout. S&G - Tie. Both oddly made the same spelling errors. Thus, this tied. Arguments - Tie. Neither really out-performed the other in terms of pursuasion. Which is why this debate falls upon... Sources - Con. Pro failed to utilize sources in this debate whereas Con provided empirical evidence showing the beauty of the sunsets in Venice.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.