The Instigator
chuck_viking
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points

Is Obama gonna beat Hilary Clinton????

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
lannan13
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/29/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 368 times Debate No: 74457
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

chuck_viking

Con

Have you seen the polls. She is gonna beat him to the ground.
lannan13

Pro

I would have to say yes, because if we just look at history we can see that it repeats itself and the last time these two squared off we can see that in the 2008 election that Hilary Clinton was defeated by Obama by a 52% to 48% vote. (http://en.wikipedia.org...) Since history repeats itself we can see that Obama will win the election again over Clinton. (http://www.goodreads.com...) Plus Obama is good vs. women as in the Presidential election he beat Sarah Palin, who mind you is also a female, so we can see Obama can definately beat Clinton as he's already beat Palin and Clinton.
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
What @Jalen said.
Posted by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
Probably hoping some Obama fan jumps in thoughtlessly.
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 1 year ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
Obama ain't running for Dictator this year.
Posted by JalenCaudill 1 year ago
JalenCaudill
This would make sense if it was 2012.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Biodome 1 year ago
Biodome
chuck_vikinglannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did not really provide any arguments at all, besides citing some polls, which he did not provide sources for. Pro, on the other hand, did cite some real sources and made a stronger argument overall.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
chuck_vikinglannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro only gave arguments, backed with sources.