The Instigator
eosh89
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Travniki
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Is PETA too controversial?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Travniki
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/2/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,613 times Debate No: 21670
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

eosh89

Pro

While I do agree PETA stands for a good cause, PETA takes things too far.
Travniki

Con

Let's do this thing.
Debate Round No. 1
eosh89

Pro

eosh89 forfeited this round.
Travniki

Con

Well this is annoying. Since pro has the burden of proof I see no reason why PETA takes things too far. They simply advocate the rights of animals, and are still legitimate and legal so I don't know why they would be considered controversial.
Debate Round No. 2
eosh89

Pro

eosh89 forfeited this round.
Travniki

Con

In hopes of inspiring my opponent to actually participate in the debate he instigated I will make a ridiculous argument.

Premise one: The human race still exists

Premise two: It is a Sunday afternoon:

Conclusion: PETA is not controversial


I ask everyone who views this debate to give me the conduct point, just so I don't have another damn "tied" debate because someone starts a debate and refuses to participate in it
Debate Round No. 3
eosh89

Pro

eosh89 forfeited this round.
Travniki

Con

Travniki forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
eosh89

Pro

eosh89 forfeited this round.
Travniki

Con

Travniki forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Mak-zie 5 years ago
Mak-zie
eosh89TravnikiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's arguments were really not that good, but Con was the only one to present any debate here at all.