The Instigator
gemma_budworth
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Shaz1234
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Is Photograpy An Art Form?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
gemma_budworth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/3/2016 Category: Arts
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 270 times Debate No: 96683
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

gemma_budworth

Pro

I believe that photography is an art form. Not only does it represent a meaning, but it contains beauty and emotion for all to see. What is your opinion on this topic?
Shaz1234

Con

I completely disagree. How can photography be called art when all the person is doing is clicking a button on a camera. Art can only be made by living things, not by non-living devices. Let's take painting for example, a camera is a machine but a painting is only created by humans. A photo only records what is there, but the artist creates a painting by using their own skill and emotion.
Debate Round No. 1
gemma_budworth

Pro

If you are saying that the camera does all the work when taking a picture, you are wrong. The photographer is the one behind the camera, controlling every aspect of how to take the desired photograph. Going back to painting, if you believe that the camera does everything when taking a photograph, then a paintbrush must do everything when putting together a painting. It is the same thing; the photographer is behind the camera and the artist is behind the paintbrush.
Shaz1234

Con

I understand what you are saying, but I personally think that art is creating something brand new. You have to create something that has its own meaning and hasn't been seen before. Therefore, photography does not fulfil this criteria because photography is taking a photograph of something that already exists. Photography can seem artistic because because it may look pretty, but in reality, taking a picture of scenery or a building is not art.
Debate Round No. 2
gemma_budworth

Pro

Does it really matter that the subject of matter is already existing? I believe not. It requires great skill to capture the perfect picture and bring a whole new perspective into it. I agree that anyone can take a photograph, but there is so much more to photography than a simple snapshot. The photographer has to not be aware of the correct lighting and angle to use, but they have to know how to turn something ordinary into extraordinary, bringing along emotion with it. From this point onwards, the photograph has the advantage of being edited; further enhancing it and turning it into a piece of art. But in my opinion, each photograph carries along its own meaning, and that meaning can be different depending on how you feel. So, photograph is most definitely an art form; it is beautiful to look at, it requires skill, but most importantly, it contains emotion.
Shaz1234

Con

I appreciate your opinion, but I still personally feel that photography is not an art form. This is mainly due to it not being created from scratch and the camera doing the majority of the work. However, it was good to hear a different view as it has allowed me to see both sides of the argument. We should do this again another time, bye.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Matt_L 1 month ago
Matt_L
gemma_budworthShaz1234Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Agreed With Pro Before Agreed With Pro After Neither party was rude The Grammar of both parties was equal Both parties made good points Neither used Sources
Vote Placed by warren42 1 month ago
warren42
gemma_budworthShaz1234Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's main point was about how the camera does most of the work. Pro refuted this, saying the photographer manipulates angle lighting and other settings. Pro seems to suggest art as anything created for aesthetic pleasure, and asserts photography meets this definition, as photography can have beauty. Con never refutes this.