Is Pokemon the First Movie actually a great movie
Debate Rounds (4)
second round: argument
third round: finding errors in your opponents argument/countering
fourth round: countering the counter
This is my first debate.
Good Luck =)
2. This FIRST movie takes no part in any future storyline and so it wastes your time.
3 Somehow the tears of the Pok"mon bring ash back to life. How does that make sense? Do they cry him back to life?
4. This movie should not be for children: the ending scene with all the Pok"mon fighting is sad, violent, and cruel. Also Mew two blows up a lab and kills innocent scientists! For Kids!
5. In the end violent scene, since the lab-created Pok"mon are exactly alike, you don't know who to route for!
6. The first scene is confusing and gives no info since you don't know anything or anyone.
Now state your points: no counters yet.
The first pokemon movie was in 1998, and we still talk about it very much 17 years later.
1. It's great
2. It's not great
They are obviously talking about the second kind because of lack in storyline and entertainment. Your argument, like the movie, is irrelevent.
In the next round you may only counter the R2 argument (read R1 format). You may not create an argument or rebute this counter
We are talking about the first movie, not the TV show or cards. You have given me nothing else to counter R3 so my turn is over.
(NOW you counter R3
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.