The Instigator
Bananna
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
16kadams
Con (against)
Winning
27 Points

Is Putin drunk on vodka?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
16kadams
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/2/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 703 times Debate No: 69328
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (5)

 

Bananna

Pro

Putin is drunk
16kadams

Con

Pro has the BOP to prove Putin is drunk on Vodka. As he has not proven this, I win automatically.

Also, the resolution is in the present tense. Right now, it is 4:32 AM in Russia. Putin is probably asleep, so he cannot be drunk. It is also a Monday, not a typical day to get drunk.

Also, it is possible that Putin does NOT drink alcohol at all.
http://www.encyclopedia.com...

I win.
Debate Round No. 1
Bananna

Pro

Bananna forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Bananna

Pro

Putin is drunk becuase Have you seen Him???????????????????????????????????????????????????? He is trying to take over Ukraine, modernize the arctic by building military bases, and he developed a new rocket system that is more devastating than nuclear bombs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is doing this to take over the World and kill everyone in his path. He is the 21 century Hitler. He wants to take over the US to get back Alaska and all of Europe. He is going to kill all Jews and attempt to rebuild the USSR. He is doing this to destroy the human way of life. He is trying to get revenge from all the sanctions Russia has and destroy those countries so he has no competition. He also says "bon vodka" which apparently means good liquor.

PUTIN IS DRUNK
16kadams

Con

Doing extremist things =\= being drunk.

He offers no proof he says "Bon vodka". And I just said it, and I don't drink. So saying a phrase =\= being drunk.

I provided evidence he is not drunk. Vote con
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by debate_power 2 years ago
debate_power
Putin copies the West's actions, and he's instantly "drunk". Nice.
Posted by Bananna 2 years ago
Bananna
Bannana is cool
Posted by 16kadams 2 years ago
16kadams
Yes, but it is irrelevant as Putin spends most of his time in Western Russia where the differences would only be a few hours either way. It is 4:52 Moscow now ;D

Look here (http://www.worldatlas.com...).

So although you can semantically argue against what I said, he is likely in the large Western timezone which proves the point.
Posted by Emilrose 2 years ago
Emilrose
You mean 4:32 AM in Moscow? Russia has a few different time zones.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Bananna16kadamsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Pro forfeited a round which is rarely acceptable conduct in any debate setting. S&G - Con. Pro horrendously misused punctuation in round 3. Con misspelled wrecked. Balanced out. Arguments - Con. Pro fails to present a coherent case affirming his stance. Con was able to show the faults in Pro's reasoning, and largely stood unchallenged. For this, Con wins arguments. Sources - Con. Pro failed to utilize any sources in this debate whereas Con did. This is a clear win for Con.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
Bananna16kadamsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never meets his/her burden of proof, so args to Con. Conduct to Con for Pro's round forfeit. Con didn't quite use the reference properly, in that he did not cite from the reference, so I can't give source points.
Vote Placed by debate_power 2 years ago
debate_power
Bananna16kadamsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture is all the RFD I need.
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
Bananna16kadamsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited a round, abused punctuation and failed to present an argument for Putin's drinking habits.
Vote Placed by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
Bananna16kadamsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF by Pro and inability to fulfill his BoP.