The Instigator
PokeSkrillex
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
okokcalmdown
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Is Zelda a better game than Call of Duty?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/2/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 339 times Debate No: 66187
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

PokeSkrillex

Pro

Legend of Zelda is obviously a better game than Call of Duty because it takes a while to complete the story, unlike CoD which takes around six hours to complete the campaign. Some people might argue that CoD is good for multiplayer, but multiplayer gets SUPER old after a while and is just going around shooting your friends, which is not a real war strategy. People spend their time "quickscoping, hardscoping, MLG360NOSCOPING" and other things that does not happen in the real world. Some people might say that the physics in Zelda are not realistic either, but it was not made to be realistic, like CoD.
okokcalmdown

Con

well it really depends on what you like. not all gamers are the same. yes, ever once in a while it's good to sit down to a game of CoD, or even Zelda. But in truth either game is fine. I love zelda's story line, and i love CoD's multiplayer. These two games are completely different, and i'm not sure if one can be better then the other. But my point is, it really depends on the gamer.
Debate Round No. 1
PokeSkrillex

Pro

PokeSkrillex forfeited this round.
okokcalmdown

Con

okokcalmdown forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
PokeSkrillex

Pro

PokeSkrillex forfeited this round.
okokcalmdown

Con

okokcalmdown forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.