Is abortion immoral if the fetus consents to the procedure
Debate Rounds (2)
While the relativism of the word "moral" is ongoing, I will debate from the point of view most likely associated with the word.
Historically and currently, most debates on abortion are from people of faith. The issue is the the beginning of life, whether it begins with conception or with birth. Based on this, "moral" refers to "being a good person" from a God-fearing type of person's perspective.
In the same way, actions that are considered "immoral" are those that do not reflect the actions of someone who has a relationship with God, or at least the Judeo-Christian perception of God. "Thou shalt not kill" comes to mind.
Suicide is not a felony, but assisted suicide is. Murder, by the definition of morality provided, cannot be moral, and must be regarded as immoral.
Conclusion: Even if the fetus consents, abortion must be regarded as immoral.
Also consider, if the actions of the two consenting parties do not directly harm anyone besides the consenting parties how can that be considered immoral?
MLHobbes forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: confuct for forfeit. also con's example of divine law as reason against assisted suicide was pretty well refuted by pro's assertion that Jesus basically used his disciples as accomplices.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.