The Instigator
waffeman
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
dsjpk5
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

Is any god real or not?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
dsjpk5
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/16/2017 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 497 times Debate No: 99025
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

waffeman

Con

Is god real?
dsjpk5

Pro

Definitions:

For the purposes of this debate, God will be defined as a maximally great being.

Argument:

The very possibility of God implies His actuality.
P1: It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
P2: If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world.
P3: If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
P4: If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
P5: If a maximally great being exists, in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.
C1: Therefore, a maximally great being exists. [1]

Summary:

As I am the only one who made an argument, I should be awarded argument points by default.

Source:

1. http://www.iep.utm.edu...
Debate Round No. 1
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 12 months ago
FollowerofChrist1955
You should attend this debate:
Atheism- A lost reality! A hopeless, helpless cause!
Posted by canis 12 months ago
canis
No.No.No. Only Odin is real..
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 12 months ago
FollowerofChrist1955
Better review this debate;
Atheism- A lost reality! A hopeless, helpless cause!
Hell, Who will go there, and Why?
Posted by canis 12 months ago
canis
Yes. Odin is real.
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
Said the atheist.
Posted by CosmoJarvis 1 year ago
CosmoJarvis
Con lacks any argument and dsjpk5's doesn't make any sense.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by JimShady 10 months ago
JimShady
waffemandsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Seems like a noob mistake for waffeman, and I kinda feel sorry for him. But not that much. I agree with Pro whole-heartedly, and conduct/spelling is tied. dsjpk5 actually makes an argument, even though it's kind of iffy, and, well, Con kind of missed out on the "argument" part, as well as sources. Victory, in my opinion, to dsjpk5!
Vote Placed by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
waffemandsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: All con did was ask if He was real, pro actually made an argument. Pro was also the only one to use sources.
Vote Placed by tommylibertarian1 12 months ago
tommylibertarian1
waffemandsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made an actual formal argument. I would argue that it wasn't a sound argument but at least is was an argument. Why was this only one round??
Vote Placed by drewyman83 12 months ago
drewyman83
waffemandsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I mean pro gave an actual argument and layed it out