Is black a color?

Black is a color, and the electromagnetic radiation is just the factors. If you put them together, all the pigment makes black. If black was not a color, we would not be able to see it.

Black is a color, and is perceived in the same way as red, blue and green and other colors. How does it have any less worth than any of the other colors? If you think not, think about this, black is a shade. Which is also a color. Put a coffee mug on your table with a well lit source of light. On the opposite side of the light, there is a color emitted called black. It is a color *and* a shade.
Yes, that is correct that the color white is composed of all the colors of the rainbow. Give yourself a gold star. But I said that all the pigment conceives the color black. (p.s please be specific, you do agree that white too is a color right?)

[http://www.thefreedictionary.com...] Definition number two: A substance, such as a dye, pigment, or paint, that imparts a hue.

Black is a dye, pigment AND paint that does make (information) known; communicate a color AND shade.

I am not sure how you counter my argument unless you cannot see the color black (and white...?) because 1) You see black, in skin pigment, pupils, animals, ink, hair, nature, everywhere. If black wasn't a color, you wouldn't even be able to dream of it, and it was be completely unknown to human kind, and thus we wouldn't debate over it. So despite not being in a spectrum that you provided, it can still be seen with your very own eyes.

The electromagnetic spectrum does not appear to have the color black, no. Does the color spectrum contain pink and brown or purple or magentia? These are colors right? So your argument should also include those colors.

Please view this website: http://dev.emcelettronica.com...

Look at the spectrum. This unlike yours it does include black.

If you don't agree, please read the Relaxation Oscillator Circuit paragraph. It stats, " the colors white and grey have the same chromaticity, but different luminance levels."

White (which is also a color) gray and black have the same chromaticity. White and black are classic opposites. White, gray and black do have different luminance levels. This results that black has a place in the spectrum. Pink is simply lighter than red, (not sure how to sciencetifically put it) and brown is darker than red, as listed. So if the pink or brown or perhaps.....black ...in this spectrum is not visible to you, then you do know that it does belong in the spectrum.

Also, I forgot to stat in your first argument to please be more specific and put into your own words what a electromagnetic spectrum is. According to my research an electromagnetic spectrum is a the range of wavelengths or frequencies over which electromagnetic radiation extends. The frequencies over which electromagnetic radiation extends? How does this have to do with anything with colors? But in the first paragraph of the website I have asked you to view, it states, "All light is electromagnetic radiation that is visible to the human eye."
So this means that the electromagnetic spectrum is just light visible to the human eye? But black is the absence of light, and it is still visible to the human eye. So please explain me the importance of the electromagnetic spectrum, or else it's irrelevant to our debate.

If I sound aggressive, it is not deliberately. Thank you.

I'm actually a woman, I just need to change my profile slightly lol.

If black did not emit any light, we would not be able to see it. This means, black does emit light, thus yes it is a color.

Please read my entire argument. Don't debate, or just drop out of you cannot read my entire argument. You've addressed zero of my points. I'm extremely disappointed that my competition is as easy as a whore.

I'm not going to search for your argument. Don't abuse the copy and paste. So far, you have no proved any vaild points.

If there was no light emitted we would not be able to perceive a color. We wouldn't be able to see it. These colors we can't see are colors that haven't been created. We see black. It is emitted by light. To us, black has the minimal light, but that's just to our eyes. Maybe if we had a different eyes we could perceive no light at all, something beyond black.

Rebuttals

"if therr was no light emitted we would not be able to perceive a color."

Incorrect.

White light is composed into all colors (According to definition). Therefore, since there is no black, it does not emit light (According to definition again).

Conclusion

- "So far, you have no proved any vaild points."

Actually, I have. We have concluded (From my passage of R1) that true colors emit and possess light. White light is composed of all true colors. Therefore, since black isn't there, it is not a color.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I thank my opponent for accepting this debate and presenting actual arguments. I appreciate it.

"White light is composed into all colors (According to definition). Therefore, since there is no black, it does not emit light (According to definition again)."

No black? Does not emit light? How does that have anything to do with your first sentence? Besides, white, the color, is composed of all the colors. Light being reflected on something determines the color. No black? Clearly there is black, as in my previous examples. If it didn't emit light, then we wouldn't be able to see it. Please look around you to see there is black, and that it emits light. If you didn't see black, then it doesn't emit light. (to straighten it out for you black = emits light)

And I bring up again, please do not make me search for your arguments. As far as I am concerned, all my points made for all the rounds are valid. Any of your replies in my debate, especially your argument in round 3, have all been invalid, unrelated or just plain off topic. Thanks for trying. Your getting pretty good at copy and paste.