Is euthanasia reasonable ?
Debate Rounds (3)
Round 3 is rebuttal and conclusion.
Definition: (1) Euthanasia : It refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. (http://en.wikipedia.org...)
(2) Reasonable: Governed by or being in accordance with reason or
sound thinking. ( http://www.thefreedictionary.com...)
I hope someone who is interested in this topic will accept the debate.
I accept this debate.
While PRO's dictionary definition of "reasonable" is much too broad, I hope that through the second round, its context will become more precise. I'll leave my own definition of reasonable until my own argument in the next round.
To simply put, PRO needs to show WHY the benefits of euthanasia outweigh its disadvantages; vice versa for CON. Since PRO did not put any semantic-related limit on the word "reasonable," both sides will be allowed to argue for the various aspects of this issue - the practical, the moral, the social, and so on.
I look forward to a debate that is enlightening for both sides.
Firstly, euthanasia contributes to liberating a patient from extrem pain. He or she has been suffering from physical pain and mental stress for a long time. They find it difficult to think, read and write every day. They can enjoy neither sports nor hobbies, as they used to. Moreover, a human being who can not express what he or she has to say in mind finds it difficult to communicate with others. Those conditions deprive of the meaning of life and hope from a human being.
Secondly, a patient who is required to choose euthanasia can not expect that he or she can live for a long time.
I believe many of them tend to receive a hospice care. It is ``a type of medical care provided to patients with terminal
illnesses who generally have less than six months to live. It is characterized as a philosophy of care during the end-of- life and provide care 24hours, seven days per week.``(http://www.ehow.com...)
Therefore, they face a condition in accepting euthanasia without hesitation.
Thirdly, a patient and the family members must shoulder a heavy financial burden. Therefore, euthanasia contributes to reducing a large amount of health care costs for them.
Forthly, viewing from the management of a hospital ``the energy of docters and hospital beds could be used for people whose lives could be saved instead of continuing the life of those who want to die which increases the general quality of care and shortens hospital waiting lists.``(http://www.executableoutlines.com...)
Finally, from the religious and Christians point of view ``the Bible does not spcifically forbid or condone euthanasia.``
And ``our bodies belong to God, not us.``(http://www.executableoutlines.com...)
From above arguments I believe that each person should have the right to leave this earth with dignity without having a physical and mental hardship.
I am looking forward to reading the arguments of Con. Good luck.
Wordkill forfeited this round.
``Since the 1970s, the term `quality of life` has been adopted by the pro-death movement, and its meaning has changed from `quality of life`to `quality of living` to the `quality of life` to the `value of life.`
These changes in meaning have promoted the belief that a life with low quality is not worth living. The result has been the inevitable conclusion that some people are less valuable than others. Such people are said to be `better off dead`or to have a `right to die.`(http://www.inplainsite.org...)
In conclution, ``the word `euthanasia` comes from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos and means `happy death` or `good death.`(http://afterall.net...)
Therefore, I believe that euthanasia is a reasonable decision.
Thank you for reading my arguments. Good luck.
Wordkill forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.