The Instigator
hudsonhammie1948
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
KingofEverything
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Is fast food bad

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
KingofEverything
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/17/2015 Category: Health
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 372 times Debate No: 82723
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

hudsonhammie1948

Con

Fast food is not that bad you have the choice of a salad or a hamburger
KingofEverything

Pro

The salad could still be unhealthy and have too much dressing.

Not "that" bad implies that it is bad, just not terrible. Somewhat bad is still bad.

The resolution is negated.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
Ok. His argument was negated.
Posted by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
Affirm - proven right
Negate - proven wrong

Since you were pro the resolution was affirmed.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
hudsonhammie1948KingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Well, he didn't negate, but he did explain why Con's negation was ineffective. Since it's sort of just assumed that burgers are bad, and since it was also assumed that salad dressing is bad, there's really not much I can do but go with the only side making unchallenged assertions, and that's Pro.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
hudsonhammie1948KingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Well the resolution wasn't negated. It was affirmed but nevertheless, con's arguments were responded to and due to one round his arguments were not responded to and they still stand.