The Instigator
Memorzum
Pro (for)
The Contender
backwardseden
Con (against)

Is genocide necessary in certain situations?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Memorzum has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/21/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 534 times Debate No: 103268
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

Memorzum

Pro

I think it's absolutely necessary sometimes, let's imagine an evolved Third Reich, with similar morals to them. The only difference is that they are incredibly loyal, and are near impossible to sway to another side. These people will not except diplomacy and will keep commiting horrible crimes until you put their entire country or race or whatever to death.
backwardseden

Con


Genocide is never necessary. All you are doing is bringing in hate, suffering, pain,. needless death, war, violence, greed, gibberish that nobody understands, of course you have to bring in religion of some type, bloodshed, with each day more powerful weapons and the screwed up minds that build them, of course you have to have the politicians that back these genocides for whatever reasons they try to justify them, etc etc etc…
Can’t people just get along? Is that so fricken hard?


It wasn’t until about 300 - 400 years ago where some of the world did get along with the Buddhists, the Hindus, the aborigines, those who worship Gaia Mother Earth, the Inca, many native American Indian tribes etc etc etc they lived in peace, and some still do that they cared about each other and were at one with the earth, and then the white male sweaty pig greasy christian decided to show his face around the world and spread his egotistical genocide filth. So no, genocide most certainly was not necessary back then.
Genocide isn’t necessary now. No one needs to die. Its not a requirement unless you believe in religion and god. And let’s be honest here… people get horrified when there’s a small little terrorist attack. Does anyone really think anyone can pull off a true genocide now-a-days with every sense of the word? Its NOT taking place in Syria - yet.


Hitler? He considered himself to be a devout christian.
Hong Xiuquan considered himself to be the younger brother of christ.


If genocides do take place, all they would do is be a little ink blot on a population because after one has happened, a population bounces back in a hurry. Its the law of the land.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by backwardseden 1 year ago
backwardseden
Well YOU are incredibly stupid for believing in god. Oh and a little teeny tiny teeny weeny teeny bopper 15 year old with the voice of a mouse telling me what to do is hilarious and never works and only makes you look incredibly stupid. Oh and btw, religion has quite a bit to do with this topic which is why I accepted this debate. Duh. Grow up rather than pretending to be someone you are not. K snookums?
Posted by Shanor 1 year ago
Shanor
Dude. Stop putting religion into every argument you do. You are just making yourself look incredibly stupid.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.