The Instigator
wagwan_pifffting
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AltDialect
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Is "hek" or "frik" a bad word in the eyes of GOD?!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
AltDialect
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/18/2017 Category: Religion
Updated: 7 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 550 times Debate No: 105941
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (17)
Votes (1)

 

wagwan_pifffting

Pro

i believe that hek and frik is a bad word in the eyes of god but i dont know anymore plz help XXXTENTACION
AltDialect

Con

No. Using the terms "Hek" or Frik" would not be bad in the eyes of "God". For it is not a curse word. Many consider it to be a form of cursing, kind of like a slang, but I do not believe it is.
Debate Round No. 1
wagwan_pifffting

Pro

WEll sir i believe u r rong becuz i said so and i am acoustic biggir than leav. IM MORE RELEVANT THAN YOUUUUU!! YOU ARE IRRELEVANT> or r u dun Dunn DUNNNNNNNNNN
AltDialect

Con

You stating that you are right just because you are... whatever you said... is very irrelevant. It is truly sad to see how many people go on this website to have fun when it was made to debate. And you not being able to spell correctly proves that you don't have a point. Therefore, you are losing.
Debate Round No. 2
AltDialect

Con

The words Hell or F*ck would be a bad word. But how can you tell which would be bad in the eyes of God? You cant.
Debate Round No. 3
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by whiteflame 6 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Flatstanley// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Pro. Reasons for voting decision: He smart an gud pont

[*Reason removal*] Not an RFD.
************************************************************************
Posted by Flatstanley 7 months ago
Flatstanley
I agree spoogity monser saiys thet h*k an fr*k r crul an disgesin words an r bad
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
I love this debate just sh*tting on little 7yr olds
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
Just seeing from that I can tell you have no sense of humor @AltDialect
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
@AltDielect I am here to prove how moronic and gullible you are as much as believing this debate as stupid as that is, you are showing how much you really believing into this debate when realizing while reading this comment you are gullible judging a kid for not spelling his words correctly knowing that he can actually spell since he is 12 years old, judging from that therefore you are showing how you have lost this debate. You piece of pooopy pie hole butt.
Posted by wagwan_pifffting 7 months ago
wagwan_pifffting
wehn i eet rise bol resturunts i oof a minecraft roblox in my doctar mummeee
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
shall suck my lolli
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
you
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
but
Posted by lil_bread 7 months ago
lil_bread
i veri sori fur me laugage @wagwan_pifffting
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by PowerPikachu21 7 months ago
PowerPikachu21
wagwan_piffftingAltDialectTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con since Pro appeared to be trolling, not really engaging in the debate he started. "WEll sir i believe u r rong becuz i said so and i am acoustic biggir than leav. IM MORE RELEVANT THAN YOUUUUU!! YOU ARE IRRELEVANT> or r u dun Dunn DUNNNNNNNNNN", a quote from Pro's R2, is an example of a lack of conduct, seeming to insult Con by calling him irrelevant. I would also award S&G to Con, but Pro's wasn't quite at that point (but I feel it was close). Only Con made a real argument, since "hek" isn't a swear word, just slang. Pro never really attempted to properly refute it in R2, then seemed to give up in R3. Thus, Argument points to Con. No sources were used, so no source points.