The Instigator
AlijahNelson
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
biologicalNonsense
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Is human destablilization a proper form of controlling a population?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/19/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 729 times Debate No: 25696
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

AlijahNelson

Con

Human destabilization isn't a proper form of controlling a population. who ever opposes this, I will debate !!!
biologicalNonsense

Pro

I will be accepting the opposing angle, that human destabilization is a proper form of controlling a population.

First of all, I will define the terms, since my opponent hasn't done so already. Destabilization- "To upset the stability or smooth functioning of" (http://www.thefreedictionary.com...) Second of all, the term "Proper" in the resolution is not properly defined, so it's not currently debatable - it's up to the opponent to define what proper "is" and "isn't".

Now, to polish out my arguments as to why this is proper:

Human Destabilization is a necessary evil when actions demand it. People are unpredictable, unique, and manic, making them a threat to chaos and anarchy. Human Destabilization will control them when the law is no longer capable of doing so, acting on it for their own good. Sociologists and experts may find it horrible, or cruel, but it's something to maintain order and restrictions. When humans destabilize, they don't have the power to resist, losing the resources, whether mental or physical, leaving them manipulative and malleable in the hands of their leaders. Human Destabilization is also proper in the means that it's fair; the entire population would be destabilized, not specifically one in particular, eg. to get control the entire American population would be destabilized - not just the African Americans, Asian Americans or other subgroups.



For this moment, until my opponent proves it's illegality, or reasons otherwise, you vote CON because without fulfilling the burden of reasoning PRO, the CON automatically wins.

Thank you.
Debate Round No. 1
AlijahNelson

Con

AlijahNelson forfeited this round.
biologicalNonsense

Pro

biologicalNonsense forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.