The Instigator
thetallest1
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points

Is it canniblism to eat someone made of chocolate?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/21/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 803 times Debate No: 26420
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

thetallest1

Con

Ok if someone is made of chocolate they most likely are not alive.
emospongebob527

Pro

I do accept, so my opponent may present her case.

But before we begin............ I would like to point out a flaw in Con's case..............

"Ok if someone is made of chocolate they most likely are not alive."

Pro makes the contention that "someone" is being eaten............ Having said that......

For her to say that they are simply not alive would be a fallacy, because when you entitle the word "someone"

Which is defined as.............. Some person- http://www.merriam-webster.com...

If you entail someone as some person, they are a person, meaning they have to be alive, which Con claims is not the case.

An utter contradiction is its entirity.

I can already assure that voting on Conduct and S&G will not be difficult.........


Debate Round No. 1
thetallest1

Con

thetallest1 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Pro

Extend my argument.
Debate Round No. 2
thetallest1

Con

thetallest1 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Pro

For the love of........
Debate Round No. 3
thetallest1

Con

So sorry. I have been extremely busy. Ok so yes if a actual person was made out of chocolate they are living and breathing. I could refer to the movie Edward Scissorhands as an example. EIn the movie Edward had been a macheine and the old man had started to make him human. If he, for example was made from chocolate and the family had eaten him, it couldn't be cannablism because then wouldn't eating any chocolate be cannabolism? Think, a world without chocolate... I shudder at the thought.
emospongebob527

Pro

In response to Con's argument:

If the doctor had made him from machine to chocolate: Not cannibalism, he would be chocolate.

If the doctor had made from machine to chocolate human: Yes, it is still a human.

If the doctor had made him from machine to human: Yes, he's human.
Debate Round No. 4
thetallest1

Con

so the person in queestion would be technically murdered and the peron who ate the chocolate 'person' would be a cannable. But, chocolate is a food. it is edible but so is a human. canabolism is illegal but eating chocolate is not.
emospongebob527

Pro

so the person in queestion would be technically murdered and the peron who ate the chocolate 'person' would be a cannable. But, chocolate is a food. it is edible but so is a human. canabolism is illegal but eating chocolate is not.

Yes.


Correct.


Correct


But not all chocolate is human.


My opponent's BOP has not beenheld up, nonetheless.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by yuiru 4 years ago
yuiru
It wouldn't be cannibalism, since in order to be made out of chocolate, they would be a plant based candy organism.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
thetallest1emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Multipple FF + a generally weak argument from Con. Those extra round would have helped him, but then again he seemed to be trolling.
Vote Placed by Koopin 4 years ago
Koopin
thetallest1emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter.
Vote Placed by Like_a_Boss 4 years ago
Like_a_Boss
thetallest1emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: lol