Is it harmful for boys to play war?
Debate Rounds (5)
I support the right of boy to play with guns and act out every role of soldiers in a war.
But I am sure it harms them to brutalize their friends!
You.. for some reason, don't see a problem with boys with plastic guns playing soldiers.
I accept. I look forward to a good debate!
So in comparison a day in the forest, playing soldiers with his young friends seem harmless.
Even when violence and brutality is used by the stronger boys on one of the weaker boys.
Even when the mood turns ugly later in the afternoon, as the boys are to interrogate their captured P.O.W. HA HA pain dude!
So let them watch their extreme porn
And remember that those soldiers used to kids once too, not even that long ago, those spanish Bastards!
A dramatisation of how it is like to be under arrest, detention, interrogation, punishment, in a South American jail.
The boys would eat stuff like this up on the Internet, so better that they not also act it out irl okay?
Ref Note 4 * modern torture of an American G.i. Joe in South American on youtube url:
and also here: https://youtu.be...
First off, generally kids don't act out the most brutal acts of violence, as they are only kids, and aren't fully aware of the horrors of war.
I turn to the title of this debate: "Is it harmful for boys to play war?"
There are two ways in which this could be harmful: psychological and physical.
One risk, the actual physical harm from playing war is minimal. If a child comes home harmed after playing with a hurtful child, his parent's aren't likely to let him play with that other child anymore.
The other risk, psychological harm, is more likely to occur, although, it is not a very high risk. Watching these acts occur on the internet can cause as much harm as acting them out. As children don't typically act out the most violent acts, this diminishes the risks significantly. Viewing these acts on the internet can be more harmful than acting them out, as the children see adults committing these acts and they may think it is acceptable.
.. but you say that the American Army and CIA thaught them how to torture?
Favorite torture worldwide in the 70's and 80's was stripping the victum naked, suspending him and torturing him with electricity + giving it to him, through his testicles! Yes all 20.000 volts. The Bastards!
Proof comes indirectly in this research:
Note 6 * http://tinyurl.com...
You bet young boys are interested in acting out torture:
Ref. Note 7 * http://tinyurl.com...
"Favorite torture worldwide" - You make it sound like many tortured others in their backyard. However, the tortures described in that book were comitted by sick people in organizations like the gestapo. That doesn't mean that every boy wants to torture others. In fact, your study shows that many nations, and thus the people in the nations, support banning torture. 5 nations have a majority, or at least a plurality, that supports banning torture altogether, even when innocent people's lives were at stake.
Your argument doesn't follow.
Ref. Note 8 * http://www.worldpublicopinion.org...
Images of Sadism is dangerous in early childhood.
Sexual sadism must be differentiated from normal sexual arousal, behavior, and experimentation. Some forms of aggression, such as beating your sexual partner, are, for a Sadist, within the range of normal behavior during sexual intercourse.
Ref. Note 9 * http://www.minddisorders.com...
"...criminals and terrorists" - Against criminals and terrorists in order to get information that could save lives. Against people who have done violent crimes. Not against a random person on the street.
"Sexual sadism..." Precisely, and yet you advocate to let children "watch their extreme porn" rather than play like normal children.
Thank you for the debate. Vote Pro! Con did not show any conclusive evidence that demonstrated that playing war was harmful, rather he showed some unrelated data. I showed from a reputable source that playing war, if properly watched, is healthy.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.