The Instigator
TheWoodOre
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
imabench
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points

Is it okay that God doesn't talk to us

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
imabench
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/12/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 516 times Debate No: 38820
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

TheWoodOre

Con

He should tell us he exists to clear up those non-believers, but he doesn't, and he doesn't let us know he's real, or is he even real at all?!
imabench

Pro

You think God has time for your stupid wealthy white people questions? Hell no! Hes GOD for f*cks sake he has more important measures to attend to, mostly making sure Heaven is as kick a** as it is. I mean even if only 50% of people go to Heaven, there have been over 100 BILLION people to ever exist, meaning that Heaven has a population of about 50 BILLION people.

Which do you think God cares more about? 50 Billion of the nicest and noblest people to have ever lived on Earth, or 8 billion whiny people who wonder why God doesnt talk to them WHEN THEY LITERALLY CRUCIFIED HIS OWN SON.

It might not just be that God is too busy to talk to us, he may just be f*cking tired of humanity already.....

- We crucified his son
- We rape, murder, and lie every day against his wishes
- The Catholic Church itself is struggling to deal with a child-sex scandal and is arguably out of touch with both God and society
- The Dallas Cowboys, 'Gods alleged favorite team' are like 1-4
- Holy land in the Middle East is frequently overrun with blood, violence, and civil war
- Most people who pray to God only ask for stupid sh*t that they could get themselves if they actually tried to work hard to get it.
Debate Round No. 1
TheWoodOre

Con

Bible says God is beyond time
imabench

Pro

^ Ill treat that as a forfeited round.

Extend all arguments
Debate Round No. 2
TheWoodOre

Con

I did extend the argument, I said that he is beyond time so he COULD be working in heaven and talking to EVERYONE right now. You were just saying that he didn't have enough time, and that's why he doesn't talk to us, but he does have enough time.
imabench

Pro

"I said that he is beyond time"

No, you said the BIBLE says he is beyond time, and the Bible doesnt mean sh*t around here and isnt real evidence.

Vote con
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Juan_Pablo 3 years ago
Juan_Pablo
As far as I'm concerned God should shut the hell up!
Posted by Juan_Pablo 3 years ago
Juan_Pablo
God doesn't talk to us?

Nothing God has to say is really that important in the first place. It's all bad news from beginning to end.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by bsh1 3 years ago
bsh1
TheWoodOreimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: I'll assume that imabench's last sentence was meant to be vote pro. Imabench wins hands-down; he had far better analysis.
Vote Placed by airmax1227 3 years ago
airmax1227
TheWoodOreimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: The BOP here is on Con to establish that it isn't okay that god doesn't talk to humanity. In Pro's R1 he makes 5 major points that argue that not only doesn't god have time, he is tired of humanity. Pro's R2 responds to the issue of time with "Bible says God is beyond time", and this not only doesn't rebut the rest of Con's arguments but doesn't establish an argument against god not having enough time (though it may have been enough if that were Cons only argument in a debate assuming the existence of god). Pro's R2 ignores that argument and later he makes the point that it doesn't stand on it's own merits. Con's R3 reiterates this point and I believe this may be enough to sufficiently rebut the "time" argument. If we assume god exists, we can assume Pro is correct that god has enough time and that shouldn't be an issue. However Con never responds to Pro's other arguments regarding god being essentially too sick of humanity to talk to it directly. Therefore argument points to Pro.
Vote Placed by blackfirewolf 3 years ago
blackfirewolf
TheWoodOreimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a really convincing argument here. I think con was over his head with this one.