Is it possible to make seven and even number?
Debate Rounds (3)
Obama and the illuminati will burn for their jobs.
First off I will take this up.
Second, Hail Hitler? The mad man who would kill people out of him being completely asinine and mentally disabled after fixing Germany? Hitler was a mad man and should never be praised except for helping German economy.
I would like to say that seven can be even if you cut it up, you have 3 on each side, then you keep breaking that 1 down until it can evenly be broken up to each one. But as a whole it can not be an even number till numerical systems change.
Also, what do you have to prove 9/11 is an inside Job?
I also want to add that Oboma will not pay as he just got in office, this was more then 10 years ago and he went in office more then 6 years after.
The illuminatie has absolutely nothing to do with this. You have to prove they are in service and around and that they had a hand in it.
I will say now that you will not be able to prove it what so ever.
Calling names and putting down intelligence, you are just a bucket of sunshine. Who knew someone would use such a cop out that fast.
It is not that you can not do that, it was me making 7 n even number, not making 6 or 8 an even number.
By the way, color of your skin means absolutely nothing, you are no different then a black man, Asian men, etc.
You still never proved anything other then ranting. So.... Please prove how your stuff in the first argument are true. In example the illuminati and Oboma and 9/11.
Also, learn to spell.
xXxXx_TittyWanker_xXxXx forfeited this round.
Since my opponent did really nothing to prove his side, I will say that I win this debate simply due to actually debating rather then ranting.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for last round forfeiture, and the number of potentially offensive(and hopefully satirical) comments by Pro. Con refuted Pro's only argument.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.