The Instigator
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
AgnosticDeism
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/29/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 300 times Debate No: 72546
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Con

First round is acceptance. I'll be candid and say It's not reasonable to Agnostic, it infers there is a God.
AgnosticDeism

Pro

There is no proof for God! And neither is there proof for the Big Bang. I rest my case.
Debate Round No. 1
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Con

I don't think you get it my friend. Agnostic is a neutral standpoint based on a lack of evidence.
AgnosticDeism

Pro

Yet there is still no proof of God, it is not reasonable!
Debate Round No. 2
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Con

I rest my case that it is reasonable to be Agnostic!
AgnosticDeism

Pro

There is no proof for God so why be Agnostic at all. Doesn't make sense.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ThoughtsOfACommoner 1 year ago
ThoughtsOfACommoner
WWWWWWWWWW, you do know you're arguing /against/ agnosticism, right?
Posted by Gabe1e 1 year ago
Gabe1e
I will happily debate this.
Posted by Gabe1e 1 year ago
Gabe1e
I will happily debate this.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Gabe1e 1 year ago
Gabe1e
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAgnosticDeismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Technically, Con won, because for some reason Pro accepted when he was against this. He was Con, but he accepted anyway. So Conduct to Con because Pro basically just ruined a debate.