Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?
Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
||1 year ago
||Post Voting Period
Debate Rounds (3)
Agnostic means to be neutral upon the belief if God exists or not!
It's not reasonable to be Agnostic because God exists!
You have no way of proving if he exists or doesn't exist. Lots of people are Agnostic. It literally means neutral about the subject. This can relate to anything in life really.
But he does exist. There must be a cause! There must be a cause to motion.
That's actually a logical fallacy called Petitio Principii. There is motion, so there must a cause to it. That is simply put a fallacy. And by definition, the opponent wins.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.