Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?
Debate Rounds (3)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blazzered 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro, con was showing desperation to win while pro was actually putting up a debate. Con misused fallacy's and had punctuation errors while pro knew logic and had no grammatical errors. Pro is the only one who put up any real argument. Con made claims but did not back them up. Neither pro or con used sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.