The Instigator
Take_that_Sputnick1
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
AgnosticDeism
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 284 times Debate No: 72680
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Take_that_Sputnick1

Con

It's not reasonable to agnostic because there is a God!
AgnosticDeism

Pro

Can you prove there is a God? I think not!
Debate Round No. 1
Take_that_Sputnick1

Con

Yeah I can. There has to be a cause.
AgnosticDeism

Pro

But what does that have to do with being Agnostic? Agnosticism is reasonable.
Debate Round No. 2
Take_that_Sputnick1

Con

No it's not because there is a God!
AgnosticDeism

Pro

It's totally fine to be Agnostic. Its a neutral standpoint do to a lack of evidence on both sides. Of course it's reasonable.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Gabe1e 1 year ago
Gabe1e
Take_that_Sputnick1AgnosticDeismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a slight argument, but did not go into depth. Nobody won this, there was basically no constructed debate.