The Instigator
VotesforCandid_Atheism
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AgnosticDeism
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
AgnosticDeism
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/4/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 307 times Debate No: 72899
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

VotesforCandid_Atheism

Con

Do you accept?
AgnosticDeism

Pro

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
VotesforCandid_Atheism

Con

It's reasonable to be Agnostic!
AgnosticDeism

Pro

Can you prove it?
Debate Round No. 2
VotesforCandid_Atheism

Con

Yeah, I'm Agnostic and I find it reasonable.
AgnosticDeism

Pro

That's not proof though!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
VotesforCandid_AtheismAgnosticDeismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con argued taking the position of Pro, which in itself was flawed; this move also gave the Instigator *full* BoP, which was *not* fulfilled.