The Instigator
SlipknotAstronaut
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
GEEZUS
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Is it reasonable to be Agnostic?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
GEEZUS
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/5/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 247 times Debate No: 72933
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

SlipknotAstronaut

Pro

Do you accept?
GEEZUS

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
SlipknotAstronaut

Pro

Are you sure?
Debate Round No. 2
SlipknotAstronaut

Pro

Anyways, it is reasonable to be Agnostic. It's okay to say "I don't know".
GEEZUS

Con

No it's not! There is a God so there is no reason to be Agnostic.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Reeseroni 1 year ago
Reeseroni
How am I supposed to vote on this?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by JesusYoloSwag 1 year ago
JesusYoloSwag
SlipknotAstronautGEEZUSTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: no one really argued but pro never proved that it was reasonable to be agnostic so I give conduct to geezuz