The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
7 Points

Is it right for people to end their life on mars?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/13/2013 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 595 times Debate No: 38828
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




Should people be aloud to end their life on mars, I dont think so. It is wrong to not be around the people you love when you die. You would have lost lots of time to live a proper life. It is wrong!


I accept this debate and I want to thank Con for instigating it, hoping for an interesting debate on an unconventional topic.

Since Con, being the instigator, didn't explicitly address it, I assume this debate not to be about euthanasia and the 'right to die' in general, but specifically the right to die on Mars if one desires to do so and has the resources to realize it. As such, I will assume for this debate that a 'right to die' were already established, since otherwise the resolution as such - highlighting 'Mars' - would be meaningless to discuss.

To refute Con's only argument of round one, I will go on to ethically analyze the three important possible cases that could arise if dying specifically on Mars were allowed.

(Case 1) The family wants a person to stay for his death, and the person wants the same

As people are only granted the right, but not the obligation, they could stay with their loved ones if they chose to. Thus, it would be right to allow people to die on Mars.

(Case 2) The family wants a person to stay for his death, but the person wants to visit Mars

To me it appears extremely selfish to force a situation upon a dying loved one, which he doesn't want at all, only because it makes bystanders feel better, and I have to question whether those who'd do this can be considered to feel "true, selfless love" after all [1]. Further, relatives could well find consolation in the knowledge that their loved one died where he could do it most happily.
Also, it is already possible to ban people from visiting you in hospital, without any moral objections being raised about this [2]. Whether one does that, or heads for Mars, is then quite equivalent in terms of being able to decide for not seeing certain people before you die.
Thus, it would be right to allow people to die on Mars.

(Case 3) The family doesn't want a person to stay for his death, and the person wants the same

Everyone would be happy, but only if travelling to Mars were allowed. Thus, it would be right to allow people to die on Mars.

Con stated it was wrong to not be with the people one loves when one is dying. She however didn't justify why this statement should result in not allowing people to do it in general. While people with friends and families will most likely still choose to die peacefully in their presence, those without anyone would be taken the possibility to fulfill their dream of once visiting Mars without any reason whatsoever.

[2] (reliability supported by 100% agreement in all comments on this religiously and politically neutral site)
Debate Round No. 1


charlottekevans forfeited this round.


Sadly my opponent forfeited this round, so I extend all of my arguments for the case of her return.

Since I only refuted my opponent's leading argument in the first round, I will now go on to justify my stance. To be fair, however, I won't add much, so that Con would be able to post both a rebuttal to my refutation and my argument within the character limit of the last round.

The Oxford dictionary defines "right" as "morally good, justified, or acceptable" [1]. I already reasoned in the first round that travelling to Mars to die there, if one is wishing to, is acceptable.
With research [2] constantly indicating that a majority of people would like to have the right to decide themselves where to die (if possible), allowing people to be able to die on Mars, if they wish to, would also be "morally good" according to a broad range of different ethical systems such as utilitarianism [3] and Kantian ethics [4]. Since further allowing for something that won't hurt anyone can in my opinion not be unjustified in general, all three definitions of 'being right' are matched, although only one would be required to prove the resolution true.

I want to close this round by addressing one important consideration: As a likely consequence of an economically reasonable accessibility of Mars (and this will be required for our debate to be of any relevance), regions of the planet will surely be annexed by certain states. This would result in Mars being included in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [5]:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. Everyone has the right to
leave any country, including his own [...]."

Debate Round No. 2


charlottekevans forfeited this round.


Con conceded the entire debate, which I interpret as agreement with all of my arguments. Thus, the resolution has been established. Nevertheless I want to thank Con for bringing up this unconventional topic as a challenge.

As a final word I want to point out that my line of argumentation mainly concentrated on the right to die on Mars with a society exclusively living on Earth. For the case of an already established Martian colony, the validity of the right to die on Mars would be even more obvious. If people were not allowed to die on Mars, once a person becomes fatally ill, families living there would have to be separated (which Con opposes) and the fatally ill person would have to be transported to Earth in a dangerous and pointless endeavour.

In conclusion: The right to die on Mars should be granted. Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by SloppyJoe6412 3 years ago
Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids,
in fact it's cold as hell.
And there is no oneeeeeeee there to raise them,
if you did.
Posted by johnlubba 3 years ago
Never mind ending your life on mars, how about staring a life there first?
Posted by Duncan 3 years ago
Umm... How do you even get to Mars to end your life there? Where is this coming from?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF, Is Con from mars or sumtink?