The Instigator
Benshapiro
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
dragon_slayer489
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points

Is it true did michael jackson molest those children

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Benshapiro
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/17/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 631 times Debate No: 35678
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

Benshapiro

Con

I believe he did, just look at the way he used to drool over children
dragon_slayer489

Pro

well listen for a second there are some logic reasons for this
1 if he did molest children why would he go to court of law for a reason if he could of payed a fine
2 that was so parents would get money from him ...
and i end my case
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by JustinAMoffatt 4 years ago
JustinAMoffatt
Everyone, I'd advise against accepting this.

I believe this account is set up as a "votebomb", or merely false voting, account.

This guy has made 3 debates since joining, and all have been 1 round (and quite easily torn to shreds).

Please don't allow him to get 3 completed debates (until we know more), because then he will be able to vote.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Jegory 4 years ago
Jegory
Benshapirodragon_slayer489Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: CON took the CON position and then argued for the resolution. S&G: PRO used no capital letters at all. Arguments: Neither was really any good. PRO's arguments didn't make sense, so this goes to CON, despite his points lacking any depth.
Vote Placed by lannan13 4 years ago
lannan13
Benshapirodragon_slayer489Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins Spelling and grammer due to the lack of capital letters in his arguements, Who won the debate is more of a question. Pro didn't provide the BOP and lost it but Con just basicly trolled so with that I'll give conduct to Pro. If Pro would have provided sources with his arguements then he would win in a landslide. I just don't believe a few of those things without sources.