The Instigator
Debbiediva28
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
babyblue10
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Is kwaj a good place to live?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Debbiediva28
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2014 Category: Places-Travel
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 647 times Debate No: 46645
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Debbiediva28

Con

I just have 1 thing to say at the moment, Kwajalein is a nuclear weapon test site site!
babyblue10

Pro

kwaj is actually a perfect place to live . it has beautiful scenery clean air that you can't find in places. it's a great place for outdoor families. it is. a small and safe island. even thou a bomb sight the bomb ps destination has the same coordinates so that it will not get in a zone of people. it's a very small very beautiful island.And family freindly. it is near Hawaii
Debate Round No. 1
Debbiediva28

Con

Listen, Kwajalein is so small tht personal vehicles are not allowed .You can walk , ride your bike, or take a taxi.kwaj is about half a mile wide and about 3.5 miles long.If I'm not mistaken, there is only 1 elementary school, 1 middle school, and 1 high school. The question is "is Kwajalein a good place to live?" It's a good place to visit but in MY opinion not to live.😄😃😀😊a86;😉😘🌀
babyblue10

Pro

I don't care what you say it is amazing it's summer all year long ,the beach is practically in your back yard.so I guess if you wouldn't wan to live on a luxury island I guess she is right this is not the place for you.!,!!!
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
Debbiediva28babyblue10Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides argued emotional conjecture, which cannot substitute for real arguments. Pro's grammar was noticeably worse than Con's, particularly the spelling. S&G to Con.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Debbiediva28babyblue10Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I found Con's arguments convincing.