The Instigator
andywong
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Is nuclear power the thing?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/27/2012 Category: Health
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 567 times Debate No: 27563
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

andywong

Con

No because they use uranium which is a scarce mineral.
emospongebob527

Pro

Responding to your resolution;

What is the thing? Nuclear power is "a" thing, but is it "the" thing?

Responding to R1 claim;


Who's they? Is uranium really a scarce material?

The suspense! Dun dun dun!!!
Debate Round No. 1
andywong

Con

andywong forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
andywong

Con

andywong forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Pro

Pro has yet to define the thing, I can not uphold my BOP.
Debate Round No. 3
andywong

Con

andywong forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
andywong

Con

It also is an good terroist attack place
emospongebob527

Pro

No, it's destructive.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ant981228 4 years ago
ant981228
When I finish my 3rd debate im voting con just for shits and giggles
Posted by ant981228 4 years ago
ant981228
andywong is "the thing," spongebob is "suspense" lols
Posted by DakotaKrafick 4 years ago
DakotaKrafick
You may want to define "the thing" in your resolution.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by blackfirewolf 4 years ago
blackfirewolf
andywongemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: WTF? What exactly is happening here? I don't think con really DID anything on this debate. At least pro just rode out the guy skipping out of the debate. I say pro wins.
Vote Placed by philochristos 4 years ago
philochristos
andywongemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con rightly pointed out the ambiguity in Con's resolution, which effectively showed that Con did not carry his burden of proof.