The Instigator
DanaForYeshua
Pro (for)
The Contender
robin.murphy1999
Con (against)

Is premarital sex morally acceptable?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
DanaForYeshua has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/5/2017 Category: Religion
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 328 times Debate No: 100581
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

DanaForYeshua

Pro

The first round is for acceptance only.
robin.murphy1999

Con

SEX, has many meanings, intrinsically, it is the melding of two individuals appreciating each others bodies cementing a bond tied between them of mutual consensus in which they surrender themselves at the mercy of their partner to do with as they wish with the faith that their partner only seeks to enjoy their company due to the love they share with each other. of course this only applies to situations where love exists. biologically, sex is the act of spreading the human seed invoking the process of reproduction so as to multiply and increase the population of humanity as in all other species simply to ensure the survival of their species by cloning the genome of humanity infinitely so as to secure the survival of at least a handful of individuals and thus the species its self. in this way their is beauty and logic to sex. my first question to my opponent is where is the beauty in sex with no bond between the two.

premarital sex has no commitment.
Debate Round No. 1
DanaForYeshua

Pro

Falling in love and getting married are what make two become one flesh. Read the book of Song of Solomon to find that premarital sex is allowed. Sex feels good, and is a gift from God. It is not healthy to deny this aspect of one's own humanity.
robin.murphy1999

Con

i agree, sex is okay, it is crucial. but only in the past. sex in the modern age must be sincere, simply going around and having sex with whoever you want spawns conflict. sex may be a gift from god as you religiously explained however just as with other pleasurable acts should be consumed in moderation, having sex with one person for the rest of your life is almost the same as being married, marriage is simply a formality which binds the two in the presence of the law and for some extremely religious people to god as well. however premarital sex doesn't have the security of commitment that marriage enforces. true love should be exclusive to an individual," that is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh" (genesis 2:24). a love life without security gives way to adultery and betrayal. premarital sex without love and commitment is no different from animalistic copulation ( which to some degree was acceptable in the past).
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by GoOrDin 10 months ago
GoOrDin
Bigot is not a reference to religious people. It is a reference to, people that attempt to vindicate their indiscretions. *** Fact. That is what Bigot means.
Posted by GoOrDin 10 months ago
GoOrDin
Solomon was an imbecile. He was such a poor father that Isreal collapsed under the reign of his son, with zero external influences effecting that rule. David was a bastard fool who named Solomon King over Isreal instead of God. - The Books of Solomon are strictly historical references from a very Intelligent man who witnessed the deprivations of adultery and drunkenness over his kingdom of na"ve and bigoted citizens. - it is not a book that justifies actions, it is a mere witness account of the Factual causes of the conflicts: adultery, drunkenness, bigotry and selfishness.
Posted by GoOrDin 10 months ago
GoOrDin
rings and paper do not make marriage a marriage. Secondly, NO it is not: WHY?: because endorsing a culture that reinforces the enablement of womanizers passively, is Heretical and Blasphemous.
Posted by canis 10 months ago
canis
No..No.No.. But it depends on how you feel about it..i had no problem..
Posted by What50 10 months ago
What50
If they want it they want it.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.