The Instigator
Sputnick1hadmelike
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
GEEZUS
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Is reasonable to be Agnostic?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 376 times Debate No: 72699
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Sputnick1hadmelike

Pro

Do you accept?
GEEZUS

Con

Yes I accept!
Debate Round No. 1
Sputnick1hadmelike

Pro

It's reasonable to be agnostic!
GEEZUS

Con

Prove it? I don't think it is.
Debate Round No. 2
Sputnick1hadmelike

Pro

Actually the burden of proof is on you!
GEEZUS

Con

Agnostic literally means neutral. There is a lack of evidence on both sides.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.