first of all, the spiderman has to be a natural person because the movie put its point on spider, which is a living element. But in the films of amazing spiderman, it shows several scenes that making the machine of web spreading. Peter Parker was not originally a scientist! he can not make it! so It is not a real spiderman!
fortunately, the chance came to me! thanks .. the most important reason that i think the first spiderman movie is better is that although it was made more than 10 years ago, it still has competitive power against the amazing spider man which is made just a few years ago.
Alright. Your opinion can be true. I mean really, it is true. But there are actually people who say the new series is not funny so your opinion can not be stood for the reason. Another reason that i pursue is that while the amazing spider man copies the entire content of spider man comic book, (the hero spider man is organized by the comic book) the first one created much content instead of copying so that it gave to audience interest.
Reasons for voting decision: Both debaters forfeited last round so each cancels their own conduct claims. However Pro forfeited in the second round, which is a liable evidence to award conduct to Con. Arguments were made based opinions till the point where con made a simple comparison between the comic and the movie, so arguments to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.