The Instigator
sofalb
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ktypsu
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Is the Amazing Spiderman better than the first films?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
ktypsu
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/10/2014 Category: Movies
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 524 times Debate No: 56349
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

sofalb

Pro

The Amazing Spiderman has superior acting, special effects, and the story is interesting and clear, in contrast to the the first trilogy of Spiderman films.
ktypsu

Con

first of all, the spiderman has to be a natural person because the movie put its point on spider, which is a living element. But in the films of amazing spiderman, it shows several scenes that making the machine of web spreading. Peter Parker was not originally a scientist! he can not make it! so It is not a real spiderman!
Debate Round No. 1
sofalb

Pro

sofalb forfeited this round.
ktypsu

Con

fortunately, the chance came to me! thanks .. the most important reason that i think the first spiderman movie is better is that although it was made more than 10 years ago, it still has competitive power against the amazing spider man which is made just a few years ago.
Debate Round No. 2
sofalb

Pro

What is your evidence? The new series is funny and moving while the old trilogy is just old. However, one thing you can say is that the old trilogy is thats it's so bad it's good.
ktypsu

Con

Alright. Your opinion can be true. I mean really, it is true. But there are actually people who say the new series is not funny so your opinion can not be stood for the reason. Another reason that i pursue is that while the amazing spider man copies the entire content of spider man comic book, (the hero spider man is organized by the comic book) the first one created much content instead of copying so that it gave to audience interest.
Debate Round No. 3
sofalb

Pro

sofalb forfeited this round.
ktypsu

Con

ktypsu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by HipBiscuit 2 years ago
HipBiscuit
Much better than the originals
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Themba 2 years ago
Themba
sofalbktypsuTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Both debaters forfeited last round so each cancels their own conduct claims. However Pro forfeited in the second round, which is a liable evidence to award conduct to Con. Arguments were made based opinions till the point where con made a simple comparison between the comic and the movie, so arguments to Con.