Is the Hennessey Venom GT faster than the bugatti
Debate Rounds (3)
Pro claims that the Hennessy Venom GT is faster than the Bugatti. However, this is not always true.
Let's approach this problem from two different viewpoints with 2 different assumptions. The two viewpoints are the only possible viewpoints in this case, other than "if it does not agree with my opinions, it is false". Proving tfhat pro's case is false in both cases allows us to know for certain that pro's case is false in all cases.
Assumption 1. For the Hennessy Venom GT to be faster than the Bugatti, it must be faster than it in all cases.
Argument 1 based on assumption 1: In physics, all frames of reference are correct. If one uses a frame of reference that moves with the Venom GT in a race with the Bugatti, then the Venom GT will stand still, making it slower than the Bugatti. As this shows that the Venom is not necessarily faster than the Bugatti, assuming assumption 1 to be true, pro's case is untrue.
Argument 2 based on assumption 1: The Hennessy Venom GT is not faster than the Bugatti in all cases; they all offer options to control speed, allowing either to be faster than the other.
Assumption 2. The Hennessy Venom GT does not have to be faster than the Bugatti in all cases in order to be faster than the Bugatti.
Argument based on assumption 2: If assumption 2 is true, then the inverse also applies: the Bugatti does not always have to be faster than the Hennessy Venom for it to be faster than the Venom. This means that the Bugatti can be faster than the Venom.
HELLO.MATE forfeited this round.
HELLO.MATE forfeited this round.
You ought to know that I prefer bass more than treble.
Yes, it is obvious--I am not generally considered slim--however, I am able to shake my posterior--which I ought to do. I have a posterior; my posterior is attractive to male youth--it is large in the correct places.
I dislike how magazines "photoshop" models to make them appear the way society wants them to appear--even though we all know that the photoshopped images have been tampered with. This practice should stop. One's beauty is natural--it can be inner beauty, too--and should not be messed around with; one's entire body is flawless, from one's head to one's toe.
My mother once told me not to worry about my appearance: male youth often enjoy touching posteriors while sleeping at night. I am not an anorexic stickfigure, nor a "barbie doll" who was manufactured through plastic surgery--if you enjoy people like them, I am not for you.
I am attempting to make posteriors more popular in pop culture: I am bringing "booty" back. If you are skinny, and think that you are fat, then you should not worry about your size: all of your body is perfect.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit by Pro who failed to make any arguments
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.