The Instigator
davidko
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
ViceRegent
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Is the Hillary Clinton's New Health Care good to people?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 1/13/2016 Category: Health
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 415 times Debate No: 84950
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

davidko

Pro

We are happy to here to debate such a important topic. Our house think the Health care is not good for people. Because Everyone in America have to pay the money. (even people who do not need the health care)
thank you.
ViceRegent

Con

Fascism and slavery to the state is always bad.
Debate Round No. 1
davidko

Pro

I think Hillary Clinton's New health care is not good to people. because some people don't want to have insurance.
ViceRegent

Con

No, fascism and slavery to the state is ALWAYS bad.
Debate Round No. 2
davidko

Pro

people have their own rights which shows that people can choose insurance whatever they want.
ViceRegent

Con

No, the whole purpose of government intervention in the market is to take away people's choices. All the government can do is tell you that if you make certain choices, the state will punish you, taking away those choices. This takes away my right as a free man to make whatever deal my fellow citizen agrees to. This is nothing but slavery to the state, which is evil.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ViceRegent 1 year ago
ViceRegent
Of course, for the U.S., wars are constitutional. Health care spending by the federal government is not.
Posted by MakeSensePeopleDont 1 year ago
MakeSensePeopleDont
@Berend -- Eeeeehhhhhhhh not really. Factually speaking, as of a year ago, all but two nations using a Universal Healthcare System (Single Payer Plan / Socialized Care / Nationalized Healthcare System / etc.) are failing, drowning, underwater, scrambling to get the budgets in the black, on fire, and in all fiscal ways....dying...unable to pay for the system.
||
The two nations that remain functional, have very specific and very temporary reasons for their current solvency as can be forcasted by normal budgeting procedures. Now, with recent events that have occurred, one of these solvent nations is.....well....no longer solvent moving forward, unless they make a single, very big change. But different story for a different post.
Posted by Berend 1 year ago
Berend
A single payer one is better, and a better use of our tax dollars than petty childish wars and over spending on military when we do not need to do it.
No votes have been placed for this debate.