The Instigator
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_Keahd
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
zommunist
Con (against)
Winning
32 Points

Is the USA infested with blue-footed mutants?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
zommunist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/2/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,233 times Debate No: 58460
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (7)

 

Teh_Milkeh_Baah_Keahd

Pro

The USA is obviously infested with flee-ridden mutants who transform into blue-footed mushroom cats
source: www.eh.org
zommunist

Con

Thank you my friend for inviting me to this rather, 'light-hearted' debate. As you have not clearly defined the premise as well as the realm involved, I shall use some of my imagination.

Source: http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net...;

This is a nightkin from the USA in the Fallout franchise. I can say it's a blue-footed mutant, as the orinal question of 'Is the USA infested with blue-footed mutants?' had asked. (I must say you have deviated from this question so you have forfeited).

However, in the real world, blue-footed mutants don't seem to exist to the best of my knowledge:
US population: 318,315,000
US mutant population: o
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org...;

This debate is ridiculous and possibly offensive to the Americans. I think you trolled.

Lastly, my GF's friend in America doesn't seem to be surrounded by nightkins and what-nots. So I can safely conclude they don't exist by scientific observation.


Thank you, vote con!
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Codedlogic 2 years ago
Codedlogic
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better arguement
Vote Placed by MrJosh 2 years ago
MrJosh
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct because PRO argued a different resolution than was stated; arguments because CON actually made an argument.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is win much science
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no evidence. Nor did pro offer any sources.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: eh.org does not help support pro's arguments
Vote Placed by LDPOFODebATeR0328 2 years ago
LDPOFODebATeR0328
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro only had a claim and a source. He had no evidence.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Teh_Milkeh_Baah_KeahdzommunistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con provided valid sources to back his argument